PURPOSE
OF THE EXPERIMENT:
The purpose of
this experiment is to investigate static friction and kinetic friction.
Determine what happens to the coefficient of friction when the normal force is changed.
Compare the static and kinetic friction of three different surfaces.
PROCEDURE:
This experiment has three parts.
In
first part
we taken a wooden block and placed a 500g mass on it. Then we measured the mass
of the system as 574 ± 1g. Before carried out the experiment we thinked about
the two situations mentioned below and drawed their free body diagrams as shown
below again.
A)
‘Consider
you start pulling the block horizontally by applying very small force without
making it move.’ According to this statement given, we drawed the diagram as
shown in below.
B)
‘Consider
you apply a slightly larger force than previous situation but still without
making the block move.’ According to this statement given, we drawed the
diagram as shown in below.
C)
‘How
are the friction forces in a and b compared? Explain your reasoning.’ We
answered this question like that the comparison between a and b can be shown
like the relation below.
Fs1 < Fs2
We thought this relation
because in this case the block did not move. Because we apply a force on the
block, there is another force related to friction. However, due to the the
stagnation of the system, this force is equal to the force that we exerted on the
system. Aditionally, when the conditions given in the part a and be provided, Fs1
< Fs2 relation is corrected.
After all, we acquired the
graph shown in below after doing the experiment.
Later on the first part, we
actually did the experiment to see our predictions were true or not and
why. We took datas while pulling the
block horizontally very very slowly until the block starts moving and we kept pulling
the block with constant speed for 3-4 seconds. We reached a graph shown below.
Then we done the data
analysis and we obtained the maximum value of the force measured by the sensor
before the block starts moving and noted this value as 5,94 N. Then we noted down the average value as 3,4 N
for the moveable part. Then we completed the first part. The questions related
to first part is mentioned in the responses to the questions part.
In second part, we keeped the
equipment setup the same as in the part1. In this part we investigated the
effect of mass on friction. Before carrying out the experiment we predicted
what we observe when we change the mass of the system that we apply force. We
also drawed a graph to clarify our answer. Our prediction:
Our
prediction drawing shown below. Then we followed the same procedures in part 1.
We assembled three different systems by using different surfaces and recorded
our measurements. We also tabulated the data.
Tables
are also shown below.
3) Compare the
values measured by the force sensor just before and after the block starts
moving. Are these values the same or different? How do you interpret the
result?
As
long as the body is stationary, the frictional force (static friction) is a
self-adjusting force and once it begins to move, the frictional force (kinetic
force) is a constant force, but has a value less than the value of limiting
frictional force.
We interpret this result from graphs like shown below.
As more force is applied, the friction
force increase. The friction force will continue to increase until the instant
immediately prior to the initiation of movement. At this moment:
–Motion≠0
–Ffriction=
Flim
–μ= μs
Therefore,
at this moment,μs= Flim/ Rn
4) Compare the
magnitudes of the friction force exerted on the block when the block is
stationary and when it is moving.
When block is
stationary, friction force’s value is measured as 5,94N and named as static
friction force. When the block is moving the friction force’s value is measured
as 3,4N and named as kinetic friction force. Generally kinetic friction force
is not greater than static friction force.
3) Discuss your
predictions.
We know that
and we thought if mass increase then the normal force increase. is
constant for each material so if normal force increase then F will also
increase. So we predicted that if mass increase then both static and kİnetic
friction forces increase. Our prediction was true. However, Coefficient of
friction does not depend on the mass applied. it depends only on the area and
nature of two surfaces in contact. However, the frictional force exerted does
depend on the the normal force, which in turn may depend on the mass.
For cardboard, the graph shown above and the magnitudes of the kinetic
and static friction force mentioned below.
Fs=7,40N
Fk=6,11N
For glass, the graph shown above and the magnitudes of the kinetic
and static friction force mentioned below.
Fs=11,4N
Fk=10,1N
Therefore we can say that friction
depends partly on the smoothness of the contacting surfaces, a greater force
being needed to move two surfaces past one another if they are rough than if
they are smooth. However, ‘friction
decreases with smoothness only to a degree; friction actually increases
between two extremely smooth surfaces because of increased attractive
electrostatic forces between their atoms. Friction does not depend on the
amount of surface area in contact between the moving bodies or (within certain
limits) on the relative speed of the bodies. It does, however, depend on the
magnitude of the forces holding the bodies together. When a body is moving over
a horizontal surface, it presses down against the surface with a force equal to
its weight, i.e., to the pull of gravity upon it; an increase in the weight of
the body causes an increase in the amount of resistance offered to the relative
motion of the surfaces in contact.’ (http://www.infoplease.com)
3) Discuss your
predictions.
We predicted that the friction force of
cardboard is greater than marble. This prediction is true, we saw that.
However, we predicted the friction force of glass is smaller than both marble
and cardboard. We are mistaken in this point because we think that if the
surface is smooth then friction must be decrease. This statement is not false
but its accuracy exists to a specific axtend. In other words, friction decreases with smoothness
only to a degree. In summary;
1. The frictional force is independent
of area of contact
2. The frictional force is independent
of the velocity of motion
3. The frictional force is proportional
to the normal force.
CONCLUSION:
‘Friction
is a key concept when you are attempting to understand car accidents. The force
of friction is a force that resists motion when two objects are in contact. If
you look at the surfaces of all objects, there are tiny bumps and ridges. Those
microscopic peaks and valleys catch on one another when two objects are moving
past each other.
The
level of friction that different materials exhibit is measured by the
coefficient of friction. The formula is µ = f / N, where µ is the coefficient
of friction, f is the amount of force that resists motion, and N is the normal
force. Normal force is the force at which one surface is being pushed into
another. If a rock that weighs 50 newtons is lying on the ground, then the
normal force is that 50 newtons of force. The higher µ is, the more force
resists motion if two objects are sliding past each other.’
(http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu)
‘If you
try to slide a heavy box resting on the floor, you may find it difficult to get
the box moving. Static friction is the force that is counters your force on the
box. If you apply a light horizontal push that does not move the box, the
static friction force is also small and directly opposite to your push. If you
push harder, the friction force increases to match the magnitude of your push.
There is a limit to the magnitude of static friction, so eventually you may be
able to apply a force larger than the maximum static force, and the box will
move. The maximum static friction force is sometimes referred to as starting
friction.
In
second part we analyse the relationship between mass and frictionforce.We
found that "FRICTION VARIES DIRECTLY WITH MASS"
According to the laws of mechanics friction is defined as the force
resisting motion. Whenever there is motion there is friction opposing it. The
frictional resistance of a surface is given by an unitless index called
coefficient of friction. This depends upon the roughness of the surface.
Friction =
coefficient * normal reaction
Thus, from
the formula it is seen that friction is directly proportional to normal
reaction and coefficient of friction. Normal reaction is nothing but the the
perpendicular reaction provided to a body by a surface as a result of all the
perpendicular forces acting on the surface due to the body.
For example,
consider a block of wood on a table. Weight of the body acts downwards
perpendicular to the surface of the table. Thus here the table will apply an
equal and opposite force on the block(Newton's third law). This force will be
perpendicular to the both the block and the table surface. Thus it is known as
the normal reaction.
As is seen
that every object exerts it weight upon the surface it is placed on.
Weight =
mass* g.
Where g =
acceleration due to gravity(=9.81 for earth surface)
Thus
increase in mass increases normal reaction. Hence increasing friction.
In third part, we analyze the depending between
frictionn force and surface. we said that friction depends partly on the
smoothness of the contacting surfaces, a greater force being needed to move two
surfaces past one another if they are rough than if they are smooth. However,
friction decreases with smoothness only to a degree; friction actually
increases between two extremely smooth surfaces because of increased attractive
electrostatic forces between their atoms. Friction does not depend on the
amount of surface area in contact between the moving bodies or (within certain
limits) on the relative speed of the bodies. It does, however, depend on the
magnitude of the forces holding the bodies together. When a body is moving over
a horizontal surface, it presses down against the surface with a force equal to
its weight, i.e., to the pull of gravity upon it; an increase in the weight of
the body causes an increase in the amount of resistance offered to the relative
motion of the surfaces in contact. Our evidence was tabulated like that.
SUGGESTIONS
AND COMMENTS:
In part 1, data analysis can not be understand easily. Explanations are too
massy. I could be written more comprehensible.
REFERENCES:
·
[Online document] Retrieved from: http://ffden 2.phys.uaf.edu/211_fall2002.web.dir/ben_townsend/staticandkineticfriction.htm
·
[Online docment] Retrieved from: http://www2.vernier.com/sample_labs/PWV-12-COMP-static_kinetic_friction.pdf
·
[Online document] Retrieved from: http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/science/friction-factors-affecting-friction.html
·
[Online document] Retrieved from: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_does_mass_affect_the_friction_of_an_object
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder